Bug#687057: androidsdk-tools progress

[Stefan Handschuh <handschuh.stefan@googlemail.com>]

Hi Jakub,

thank you for your work!

I am glad the license "issue" has been resolved.

Also, thank you for the RFS bugreport. If there is anything I can do, please let
me know.

Best regards,
   Stefan

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 04:58:02PM +0200, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> finally I've had time to make some progress with androidsdk-tools
> 
> On 9.4.2013 23:23, Stefan Handschuh wrote:
> >The one thing that has to be changed is the copyright year statement for the
> >files in
> >   swtmenubar
> >"2011" to "2011-2012" or something like that.
> 
> Updated.
> 
> >Somehow uncertain is the license of the files in
> >   uiautomatorviewer/src/images/
> >as the main directory of this subproject has no NOTICE or LICENSE file. The same
> >holds for the files in
> >   hierarchyviewer2/libs/hierarchyviewerlib/src/images/
> >
> >In comparison to that,
> >   ddms/libs/ddmuilib/
> >has images (in a subfolder) and a NOTICE file.
> 
> Google has been steadily rearranging their repository structure so I had to update orig-tar
> script once more. On a positive side, during the relocation of uiautomatorviewer and
> hierarchyviewer2 to a different repo the missing NOTICE files were added, so now we can be
> sure the images are (what a surprise :)) under Apache 2.0.
> 
> Today I've created manual pages for ddms and hierarchyviewer, there are 2 more to go and the
> package will be lintian clean ready for upload.
> 
> Since Wheezy release is at hand, I will probably postpone sending a RFS to debian-java group
> until new stable release is out and all our dependencies now in experimental are reuploaded
> into unstable, in order that we can spare ourselves an upload of androidsdk-tools into
> experimental and go directly into sid.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jakub