On 27/05/13 13:39, Chris Boot wrote:
> Now that ulogd-1.x is end-of-life ("All production systems should
> migrate to the stable series ulogd-2.x as soon as possible as we do
> not plan to make more 1.x releases."[1]), I'd like to suggest making
> the ulogd package transitional. Do you support this suggestion?
>
> Laszlo: I'd be happy to adopt ulogd to do the transition if you would
> like.
Hi Maykel, Laszlo,
I'd really like to go ahead with the transition from ulogd to ulogd2 if
you don't object. To this end, I intend to take ownership of this bug
next weekend (on or after the 8th of June) and to upload a new version
of ulogd shortly thereafter, which will turn all of the binary packages
into empty transitional packages that depend on ulogd2.
If you do object, please let me know before 2013-06-08.
I also intend to go over the bugs currently open against ulogd and
update/close them as required, starting tomorrow.
Thanks,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bootc@bootc.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature