[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706522: Fwd: Bug#706522: ITP: pcs - Pacemaker/Corosync configuration system



On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:21:09AM +0200, Martin Gerhard Loschwitz wrote:
> Filip,
> Am 17.05.2013 um 09:15 schrieb Filip Chabik <hadret@gmail.com>:
> in fact, I had already uploaded packages to experimental (I just got a REJECT on
> them yesterday for some minor things though).

This is awesome news (that you already did it, not that it was
rejected). I have fingers crossed for this to succeed next time you
try.

> Have you included pcsd? That looked highly broken the last time I looked at it.

As far as I saw (I removed packages and my built once you told me, that
you already done it), pcsd was included in the packages -- thing is, I
had no place to test it out :(

> I have actually packaged the ruby gems required for pcsd already. It's just that
> pcsd looks like something that will blow up every second, so I did not include it
> in the package I originally uploaded to experimental.

Is it the approach suggest for package maintainers? I'm asking cause I
wonder whether there's no conflict in installing gems via gem command
and APT?

Filip


Reply to: