[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706391: ITP: slimlock -- screen locker based on SLiM and slock



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Nobuhiro,

do you now, how long it is going to take to include slimlock in the
upstream version of slim?
The question, weather to package slimlock independently depends
strongly on this.

Best regards,
	Sam

On 05/03/2013 10:03 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The code of slimlock is merged into slim[0] , and development is
> working. github is a temporary repository of danny.
> 
> Best regards, Nobuhiro
> 
> [0]: http://slim.berlios.de/
> 
> 2013/4/30 Samuel Sanchez <sanchez@physik.fu-berlin.de>:
>> Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Samuel Sanchez
>> <sanchez@physik.fu-berlin.de>
>> 
>> * Package name    : slimlock Version         : 0.11 Upstream
>> Author : Danny Doest <dnoest@gmail.com> * URL             :
>> https://github.com/dannyn/slimlock * License         : GPL-2 
>> Programming Lang: C, C++ Description     : screen locker based on
>> SLiM and slock
>> 
>> Slimlock is a slim locker based on slock and SLiM. In contrast to
>> slock, which displays a black screen which goes away if the right
>> password is typed, slimlock displays (if slim is used) a lock
>> screen which matches the login screen. Furthermore it supports
>> DPMS and blocking virtual terminal switching.
>> 
>> Slimlock reads your slim config files and uses the same
>> interface. If you use SliM already, then it should work for you
>> automatically.
>> 
>> 
>> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
>> debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of
>> "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org 
>> Archive:
>> http://lists.debian.org/20130429153523.6363.57170.reportbug@znote-t60n.physik.fu-berlin.de
>>
>
>> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRh+v9AAoJEOQdkPW/4HPy/b4H/RBQ+d2WgY1B+Pkno+w9qURT
ZgBgYyaG7szssxoGR7sku9tFx/Idki0BAjOBIXJWYTINrRCXqj5c5yJWaRtpUEfk
PNuKiSsfriCUeoDMRj7YHxFSBbJnSJOFRPkj7hMBc0doIh7V44nWk+FQmMYltaz3
DypU+qmPCY8rci126OIc2w0vZv6dz+4mgFbA1G5DZrhOwWBhkjfwOonD6MNBfizW
+AjD+PoPjcDHsBraABahYRsaaozDVQYeHkUmgTRzWZu/MSt87lyiPhQhCus5qDY+
ZGZEMdoyHDaD2YLTZUtaYj9f8Dd/+UolUOL+DwZqT+kT3Fe3L3o6I3LYGJsFtKA=
=U+Db
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: