Am 06.05.2013 19:33, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 19:17:47 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
>> But why should it _replace_ MySQL, why not providing it as an
>> alternative MySQL'ish server?
>>
> Because Oracle.
That alone does not count, since it is still OSS.
As long as _MySQL_ maintainers are able (and want) to continue MySQL (or
some other person) there is no reason to not keep it in Debian.
I also can not get used to the thought that we only provide one
alternative like some other more or less popular distributions, where
you need e.g. a HTTP daemon and then you just can install Apache from
their repositories.
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: pmatthaei@debian.org
patrick@linux-dev.org
*/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature