Bug#612341: could anyone summarize the status on libjpeg-turbo WNPPs?
Am 22.03.2013 10:22, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Fr 22 Mär 2013 18:19:14 CET Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> Am 22.03.2013 09:21, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
>>> Hi Yaroslav, hi all,
>>>
>>> On Mi 20 Mär 2013 20:26:24 CET Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I have worked-in (hopefully!) all comments/requests dicussed during
>>> the last days into libjpeg-turbo.git on collab-maint.
>>>
>>> I have also attempted to allow a smooth update of libjpeg-turbo
>>> bin:package in Ubuntu by this version.
>>
>> what exactly is changed/needed?
>>
>> I did see that libjpegturbo was renamed to libjpegturbo1. In the past
>> upstream did want to have an unversioned shared lib for legacy software.
>> did that change?
>
> I have patched the versioning of the shared lib in for Debian [1], do think
> that is problematic?
well, maybe Tom Gall can comment on this. For Ubuntu I didn't care that much
because the libjpegturbo package was kept in universe.
>
> Mike
>
> [1]
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/libjpeg-turbo.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/001_versioned-libjpegturbo.patch
>
>
>
Reply to: