[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#612341: could anyone summarize the status on libjpeg-turbo WNPPs? [question for Tom]



Am 20.03.2013 08:59, schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko:
> 
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Tom Gall wrote:
> 
>>>   then Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>  also contributed (no changes in
>>>   debian/copyright were done though)
>>>   and then there was
>>> +  * Drop outdated copyright notice for /debian folder and replace by
>>> +    GPL-2+ copyright entry in /debian/copyright.
>> Hm. News to me.
> 
> do not worry -- this will be fixed ;)
> 
>>>   Tom -- do you remember a reason for choosing GPL for the debian/* works?
>>>   Ideally we should stay with a license compatible with upstream, in this case
>>>   BSD-3.  Would it be possible to change the license for your works, or am I
>>>   missing the point here?
>> I'm completely supportive of moving to BSD-3 for debian/*.
> 
> May be some people would start screaming at me for not being official
> enough, but could you explicitly state this on behalf of Linaro as well,
> so we could simply switch to BSD-3 for debian/ (as soon as Matthias
> confirms as well).  Thanks in advance!

I'm fine with that. That would be Copyright (2011, 12?)Canonical Ltd.

  Matthias


Reply to: