Bug#659632: graphite-web
Looking at the two rejections
* webapp/content/js/ext/examples/shared/icons/fam/* are licensed under CC-BY-3.0
* webapp/content/js/ext/resources/*.swf lack corresponding source code.
and dealing with the flash issue first. Without knowing in detail how
central the .swf files are to functionality, if they are just
examples, then can they not simply be removed before the upload to
Debian?
The fam icons thing - I am not sure that is a genuine rejection. If it
was an earlier CC BY license then that would be a problem, but reading
the DFSGLicenses page suggests the newer version 3.0 might be okay.
http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#Creative_Commons_Attribution_Share-Alike_.28CC-BY-SA.29_v3.0
There is some clarification by Torsten Werner in the link to
lists.debian.org on that wiki page, and it may not be much to follow
that up with the ftp folks to check the rejection of the fam icons is
genuine or otherwise.
Gary.
Quoting from page at: http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/
"The icons can also be used under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
License (Hi Debian folks!) with the following requirements:
As an author, I would appreciate a reference to my authorship of
the Silk icon set contents within a readme file or equivalent
documentation for the software which includes the set or a subset of
the icons contained within. "
Reply to: