[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of ZIM specifications

Le 20/01/2013 06:20, Vasudev Kamath a écrit :
> On 22:00 Mon 14 Jan     , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>>> I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash
>>> betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim
>>> in the package name there is  description field which clarifies any
>>> confusion between both packages for end user.
>>> So I guess renaming from upstream is not required. Please share your
>>> thoughts.
>> My thoughts are "I have been confused and thus I believe that other users
>> will be confused in the future". This is why I believe it's best to
>> rename. Furthermore, there are no file clashes yet, but the day
>> where someone will write a python wrapper for "zimlib" (and this is
>> on the roadmap apparently), it might become a real issue.
> OK thanks for sharing your views on this, apparently I didn't think of
> python wrapper for zimlib.
> @Kelson can you share your views on this.

What about "libopenzim" as package name, content unchanged?

Reply to: