Engelheart <kelson@kiwix.org>
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of
ZIM specifications
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20130114101420.GA9959@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com>
On 11:14 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> > I will ask upstream
>
> Thanks.
Emmanuel, the new upstream maintainer said as of now he has no opinion
but he agreed zim-wiki was first to use name zim.
>
> > But as I said name is actually abbreviation and renaming it doesn't make
> > sense. What do you think?
>
> I don't agree with this statement. Coming up with a name is always a
> creative endeavour and you can always come up with something different
> if really needed.
That's true. Given that this is a library a name change can lead to
problem for all projects which is depending on it (I'm not sure how many
project depends on this lib though) any way that's my thinking but I
will leave it to upstream to decide (Emmanuel is CC'd)
<snip>
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature