Bug#694653: RFP: libnet-frame-device-perl -- This module is used to get network information, and is especially useful when you want to do low-level network programming.
- To: gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#694653: RFP: libnet-frame-device-perl -- This module is used to get network information, and is especially useful when you want to do low-level network programming.
- From: Simon Fondrie-Teitler <simonft@cae.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:38:14 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] m1qwqvvpbgp.fsf@songoro.cae.wisc.edu>
- Reply-to: Simon Fondrie-Teitler <simonft@cae.wisc.edu>, 694653@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20121128182402.GN19648@jadzia.comodo.priv.at>
- References: <20121128174503.12889.41436.reportbug@songoro.cae.wisc.edu> <20121128182402.GN19648@jadzia.comodo.priv.at>
gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:45:03 -0600, Simon Fondrie-Teitler wrote:
>> * Package name : libnet-frame-device-perl
>> Version : 1.03
>> Upstream Author : Patrice Auffret <gomor@cpan.org>
>> * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Net-Frame-Device
>> * License : Perl Artistic License
>> Programming Lang: Perl
>> Description : Perl module to get network device information and gateway
>>
>> This module is used to get network information, and is especially useful when you want to do low-level network programming.
>> It also provides useful functions to lookup network MAC addresses.
>
> From a quick dh-make-perl run:
>
> Needs the following modules for which there are no debian packages available:
> - Net::Frame::Layer::ICMPv6
> - Net::Libdnet6
> - Net::Frame::Dump
> - Net::Frame::Layer::IPv6
> - Net::Frame::Simple
>
> Seems this will be a bigger project ...
Agreed, and having played around with the module more, I no longer think
it is worth it to package it for Debian. My experience with it has not
been great. It seems to be a set of packages with somewhat arbitrary
divisions, and does not interface with other perl modules nicely.
Assuming no one else thinks it's a good idea to package it, I think this
RFP can be closed.
Thanks,
Simon
Reply to: