[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#693868: marked as done (ITP: mailnag -- mail notification daemon for GNOME 3)

Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:00:10 +0000
with message-id <E1ThkEc-0002c4-Kw@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#693868: fixed in mailnag 0.4.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #693868,
regarding ITP: mailnag -- mail notification daemon for GNOME 3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
693868: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693868
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Cheng <Vincentc1208@gmail.com>

* Package name    : mailnag
  Version         : 0.4.4
  Upstream Author : Patrick Ulbrich <zulu99@gmx.net>
* URL             : https://github.com/pulb/mailnag
* License         : GPL-2+
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : mail notification daemon for GNOME 3

Mailnag checks POP3 and IMAP servers for new mail. When it finds new messsages,
it creates a GNOME 3 notification that mentions sender and subject.

(Not part of extended description: This is similar to mail-notification,
except that it's not dead upstream and it's integrated nicely with GNOME shell)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: mailnag
Source-Version: 0.4.4-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mailnag, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 693868@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Vincent Cheng <Vincentc1208@gmail.com> (supplier of updated mailnag package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:06:37 -0800
Source: mailnag
Binary: mailnag
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Vincent Cheng <Vincentc1208@gmail.com>
Changed-By: Vincent Cheng <Vincentc1208@gmail.com>
Description: 
 mailnag    - mail notification daemon for GNOME 3
Closes: 693868
Changes: 
 mailnag (0.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (Closes: #693868)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 8b0b83c219875b0c0b09c9339646439798ecbc86 1521 mailnag_0.4.4-1.dsc
 425130b5b8449a6978d34e83999e55fe2ee31e03 91941 mailnag_0.4.4.orig.tar.gz
 c4dd7f27d79e73956a3c2bc8ee7b06519d83c4b5 5099 mailnag_0.4.4-1.debian.tar.gz
 b61a50410fe75ed44486c151b5a555ba8533ccc3 93408 mailnag_0.4.4-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 d07331399b01166b65e63939f4797a2ade9daab67c8d6c15d5840cc7c7f26fdd 1521 mailnag_0.4.4-1.dsc
 54fd0fd7030370d7ad3f3f752255292aead629b8de5ae0bff38c502693f3244f 91941 mailnag_0.4.4.orig.tar.gz
 710879d09c1fc600234bf7cc565adf36f5d723b43ed8cbe44b67c2e77ed54a75 5099 mailnag_0.4.4-1.debian.tar.gz
 955d00e89063dffe2ad560d539ba2c9a2f181f73bcd18dbca3cc47fca6f46c69 93408 mailnag_0.4.4-1_all.deb
Files: 
 b7eeede85d67286f7eb81ca4f64e6fe8 1521 gnome optional mailnag_0.4.4-1.dsc
 ed8d0d4bd462fd947dbe12c8e875e2f4 91941 gnome optional mailnag_0.4.4.orig.tar.gz
 93826d8b268bb6ca48a82413b5d8eeee 5099 gnome optional mailnag_0.4.4-1.debian.tar.gz
 3eca2c2af3dce2407df67cda465aa763 93408 gnome optional mailnag_0.4.4-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQukiwAAoJEIAhAkTu07wNSfAH/2P+2fJSLuoaunP/DjNJhl0g
SqBRlNwGUvaKLSC3UI7SdEvYsgSBhIEPNhftpPy7wCUI8ENn0LGWquypiOWoEALU
VlKeAGI8AmpYSmP/37y9VyEsmzGNXFB1gNlGmimQT0uBhLHh1LtdUabOA5E++Owv
dZsZVgkQWtIK46/Wrabpg/rGjVtnxG1uuuD30bS8eKwydcdb4i4HnW5rqecthG1E
LNxy+V/YlRFBZyw48N5fy5W3WcWGEcgkWMNtEFkk2rdU2xBLRKlSPmP0+paf2PQs
rqJhbSlTZL80mbRmV+WBYo40gmHTRaKqnXFQaVXDPYFRS4q65lPD6F5Fpe8AVbU=
=P1iM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: