[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#695311: marked as done (ITP: python3-csb -- Python framework for structural bioinformatics)



Your message dated Fri, 07 Dec 2012 11:54:48 +0100
with message-id <50C1CAF8.1010003@tdido.com.ar>
and subject line Re: Bug#695311: ITP: python3-csb -- Python framework for structural bioinformatics
has caused the Debian Bug report #695311,
regarding ITP: python3-csb -- Python framework for structural bioinformatics
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
695311: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med group <debian-med@lists.debian.org>

* Package name    : python3-csb
  Version         : 1.1.0
  Upstream Author : Michael Habeck <michael.habeck@tuebingen.mpg.de>
* URL             : http://csb.codeplex.com/
* License         : MIT
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : Python framework for structural bioinformatics

Computational Structural Biology Toolbox (CSB) is a Python class 
library for reading, storing and analyzing biomolecular structures
in a variety of formats, with rich support for statistical
analyses.

CSB is designed for reusability and extensibility and comes with a clean,
well-documented API following good object-oriented engineering practice.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This ITP bug was opened by mistake, based on my misunderstanding of the
concept of "binary package" in constrast to a full package when aiming
for a python3 version of the project.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: