Bug#695194: dependencies
Control: unblock -1 by 695059
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:49:43AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:36:14 +0100
> Cédric Boutillier <cedric.boutillier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The packaging of dependencies (ruby-jwt and ruby-crack) is currently in
> > progress, as a part of the effort of a group of people to have diaspora
> > packaged for Debian. (webmock is also a needed piece for diaspora, so I
> > am sure these people will appreciate having this packaged too).
> Well, it needs "ruby-addressable (>= 2.2.7), ruby-crack (>= 0.1.7)"
> as its webmock.gemspec says. Does it need ruby-jwt?
Oh, sorry. I misread the data I collected for diaspora. You are right,
there isno dependency on ruby-jwt.
> > According to Ruby policy, the source and binary packages should be
> > called ruby-webmock.
> Yes, I intended to make ruby-webmock as binary package and webmock
> is for source package. Should I change its source package name, too?
I thing it woud be a good idea, to keep the same convention as for the
(majority of) other Ruby packages. At least, that is the name that would
be picked by gem2deb for the source package too.
Cheers,
Cédric
Reply to: