[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#626079: marked as done (RFP: gcc-4.[56]-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++))



Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:23:03 +0800
with message-id <506D0F27.9040607@gmail.com>
and subject line Close on upload of gcc-4.6-doc and gcc-4.7-doc
has caused the Debian Bug report #626079,
regarding RFP: gcc-4.[56]-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
626079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Package name    : gcc-4.6-doc
Version         : 4.6.0
Upstream Author : FSF
URL             : http://gcc.gnu.org/
License         : GFDL
Description     : documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++)


With gcc-4.5 being the current version in wheezy and 4.6 being default in 
unstable it would be very nice to have -doc packages again.
I admittedly have no real clue about dfsg/GFDL problems but my guess would be 
that it would have to live in non-free (hence the RFP).

The -doc package was removed in the course of #571759.

Thanks,

Andres



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

I'm closing this bug as gcc-4.6-doc[1] and gcc-4.7-doc[2] are already in sid. gcc-4.5 is no longer in sid, so I didn't upload gcc-4.5-doc. (I should have merged this with 619933/656044, but somehow failed.)

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gcc-4.6-doc/news/20121003T190008Z.html
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gcc-4.7-doc/news/20121003T190010Z.html

Regards,

Guo Yixuan

--- End Message ---

Reply to: