Bug#645972: Entangle (Was: useful software for medical practice)
Hi Andreas!
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:58:46PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Well, that's for packages which are just in testing and if these needs
> an update with minimal changes it is bad to have some higher version "in
> between" in unstable. This is not the case for new packages so the
> advise does not apply here.
OK, that's convincing enough for me ;-)
Changing it right now.
> > Already explained my point about that; however, feel free to "force" me
> > to change it ;-)
> Hoping to be able to convince rather than force. ;-)
;-)
> > Could you possibly point me to a specific Debian Policy Manual paragraph
> > for this change? Just to know why I'm doing this and if it's correct.
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities
>
> I do not see any conflicts to other packages. Moreover Debian Med policy
> document gives another reason:
>
> http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html:
>
> Packages of priority “extra” are excluded from some QA tests.
>
> This is nothing what we want! We want QA tests!
OK. Doing that too.
> > > add myself to Uploaders
> >
> > If this would ease the upload, ok.
>
> This is irrelevant for the actual upload because the changelog entry is
> relevant for "who has uploaded this package" and I would leave this
> untouched to honor your work on this. I just tend to put myself into
> Uploaders to express the fact that I have some interest in the package
> (which was finally triggered by the request on the Debian Med list).
OK, I must admit this was the first commit I made after your interest in
the package ;-)
Thanks for helping me having entangle in Debian!
Cheers.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
Debian Maintainer
GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A
Reply to: