On 05/08/12 20:45, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 20:24 +1000, Andrew Harvey wrote: >> On 05/08/12 00:07, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: >>> How goes the jmapviewer packaging? As I see, there's a git >>> repository[1], but it seems it was never uploaded nor update for eight >>> months now. >> I don't think it was uploaded to Debian because I couldn't find a DD to >> sponsor it. However, I believe it still needs some more work anyway. > Now you've found a DD who would upload it. Sure, it needs to be updated > to the newest stable version and conforms to the latest Debian policy. Good. Okay then I'll spend some time this week trying to get it in better shape. >>> Are you still interested to maintain it or should I finish packaging >>> that as well? >> I don't know if I can commit to anything, but I can try to help out with >> its packaging. So happy to either co-maintain, or co-contribution of >> packaging work. > Well, somehow you created it. You are set as owner and it seems you did > some commit to it. > >> Which version of jmapviewer does freemind need? Because I noticed that >> if I updated the alioth packaging for jmapviewer to the latest, it would >> pull in an embedded MapQuest logo, so we would need to either cut it >> out, or ensure it is DFSG compliant. > Sure, the image should be DFSG compliant as well. I don't know the > required version number, even if freemind contains the source jar for > jmapviewer. I couldn't find its version number. Is there any release at > all? What I could find is: > http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/viewer/jmapviewer/releases/2011-02-19/ > Nothing more. No version number, just a date. I've just been using the upstream vcs revision as the version. >> I'm more than happy to try to help out or for you to work directly off >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-osm/jmapviewer.git;a=summary >> I'm not exactly sure how much time I'll have to look into it. I'll try, >> but feel free to jump ahead and work on it yourself. > So you mean I can be its maintainer and set you as uploader? I don't mind maintaining it myself. But if you want to take over I'm fine with that too. I don't mind either way. > > Cheers, > Laszlo/GCS >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature