Bug#675626: [pkg-lua-devel] Bug#675626: ITP: lutok -- Lightweight C++ API library for Lua
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Enrico Tassi <gares@fettunta.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:34:36PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>> - based on my experience in previous teams (especially on the Debian
>> Common Lisp one), having a single point of contact for questions
>> related to all $LANGUAGE packages is really useful.
>
> Exactly. This software seems to be really tight to Lua, so It would be
> nice to have it close to it. For example when I change the lua5.1
> package I also recompile all the lua packages in the svn repository just
> to be sure I did not break them.
> In case the policy for lua packages gets changed, or lua packages get renamed,
> you may also get a patch for free ;-)
Sure thing. I was not arguing otherwise. If this package can be
overseen by the Lua team for all the benefits you list, the better!
> Unless you have serious concerns against an svn repository (that will
> eventually become a git one) I suggest you put your package there.
I'm sorry but I don't understand. This is my very first Debian
package, so everything related to package development in Debian still
escapes my mind...
I don't have any problems with using svn, but what for? To store the
source package? I'd have thought all packages were stored in the same
place/system... so I'm a little bit surprised by this. I may not be
understanding this correctly though.
Lastly, are any of you actually offering to review this package? :-)
Thanks!
--
Julio Merino / @jmmv
Reply to: