[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> # Monday 11 June  20:03:37 UTC 2012
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: <a href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/mailutils";>mailutils</a>
> tags 301962 + pending
Bug #301962 [libmailutils2] libmailutils0: Compiling against mailutils fails
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: libany-template-processdir-perl
> tags 676564 + pending
Bug #676564 [wnpp] ITP: libany-template-processdir-perl -- Perl module for processing a directory of templates
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: libfile-find-wanted-perl
> tags 676571 + pending
Bug #676571 [wnpp] ITP: libfile-find-wanted-perl -- more obvious wrapper around File::Find
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: libmasonx-processdir-perl
> tags 676565 + pending
Bug #676565 [wnpp] ITP: libmasonx-processdir-perl -- Perl module to process a directory of Mason 2 templates
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: kiwix
> tags 617813 + pending
Bug #617813 [wnpp] ITP: kiwix -- Offline reader for Wikipedia content in
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: <a href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/lua-lgi";>lua-lgi</a>
> tags 676690 + pending
Bug #676690 [lua-lgi] Please add -dbg package
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
301962: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=301962
617813: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617813
676564: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676564
676565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676565
676571: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676571
676690: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676690
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: