Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release
2012/5/3 Ryan Niebur <ryan@debian.org>:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 01:34:48PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have reviewed all the scripts from the list, I fix some typos, but
>> there are other scripts that have 2 different licenses. Below I show
>> you the scripts that were settled and those who need to reviewed
>> again.
>>
> [snip script output]
>
> Thanks for settling these.
>
>>
>> [1]: Declare a header with a license and below another license ( is it
>> necessary contact the upstream ?)
>> Fixed: error found and fixed
>> OK: OK
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> For this case it is necessary to contact the upstream to verify the license?
>>
>
> I have looked at many of these and it seems the problem your are
> noticing is they have a license text block as a comment at the top,
> but the "license" specified for the %IRSSI settings is not referring
> to that specific license.
>
> Since the "license" setting allows plain text without a standard
> format, I beleive that the authors have simply been less precise here
> without realizing the potential confusion. As long as they specify the
> same type of license, but the block is more precise about the specific
> license versions, I think it will be fine for us to just use the
> license text block which is more precise and limiting.
>
>> Thank you very much!!
>>
>
> Thank you again for your work, and patience, on this! I may be able
> to work on this tonight, but hope to get this uploaded by tomorrow, if
> not.
>
> Cheers,
> Ryan
>
>
> --
Hi Ryan
I updated the copyright file with license information found in the
header of each script.
I hope all is well now :)
Thank you very much
--
Epsilon
http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
http://www.rinconinformatico.net
http://enchulatucelu.com
http://www.todopdf.net
http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
http://www.dragonjar.org
Linux user: #477840
Debian user
Reply to: