also sprach Thilo Uttendorfer <debian@uttendorfer.net> [2012.05.01.1429 +0200]:
> No, this is a misunderstanding: If you configure logsurfer properly it
> can replace logcheck. I just would not use it that way (just my opinion),
> because the nice thing with logcheck is that the rules are very simple
> and a lot of other packages ship already their own rules for logcheck.
logcheck is a catastrophe and the rules are not standardised and
thorough mess!
> > Can logsurfer only execute an action when a filter (?) matches? The
> > nice thing about logcheck was that it always fired except if an
> > exception matched, which is the proper way to do it!
>
> You can configure logsurfer that way as well.
Good! Thanks,
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"first get your facts; then you can distort them at your leisure."
-- mark twain
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)