Bug#663456: why revive mediatomb?
Hello,
2012/3/13 Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:54:27PM +0000, Hector Oron wrote:
>> Sorry, I am unaware of any alternative, if you let me know some I
>> might have a look into them.
> I don't want to be rude, but isn't this something you should be researching
> before filing an ITP? A simple apt-cache search dlna would be a good start.
>
> I dare to say that "I'm ignorant" is definitely not a good enough reason
> for reintroducing something that was removed because of longstanding issues.
Debian is about freedom of choice and I choice to use mediatomb.
Longstanding issues are now gone....
> Do you really think you have the resources to maintain this in the long run
> where others (including upstream authors) has given up?
...thanks to Fedora being a great distro and maintaining this
software, I am not alone.
< http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=mediatomb.git >
May I ask why you seem so irritated about having mediatomb back? Are
you a developer of some alternative?
I am not the only one missing it, I got few mails about it which I
redirected to debian-multimedia mailing list.
< http://lists.debian.org/debian-multimedia/2012/03/threads.html >
Cheers,
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
Reply to: