Hi! On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:28:04PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote: > Why not name it *libnet-ssh-perl* Thanks for feedback. I woud name it this why since libnet-ssh-perl is already present, for Net::SSH. In Perl policy we have the naming scheme covering this: Net::SSH -> libnet-ssh-perl (packaged since 2001). Net::SSH::Perl -> libnet-ssh-perl-perl I agree, the doubled -perl at the end may be a bit confusing, but is derived from the name. You might ask, why another such module? Indeed that is a good question, but Net::SSH::Perl is used in testsuite for litvirt-tck. Regards, Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature