On 04/08/11 11:40, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Ximin Luo wrote (04 Aug 2011 09:48:25 GMT) : >> cs-lite has been stable for several years now with no major bugs >> reported that i can see on the review page. > > I'm not concerned with current bugs in cs-lite. > I'm concerned with compatibility with future Iceweasel releases, > which has not been taken care of upstream in the last two years. > > As long as the only change needed to have it working with newer > Iceweasel is bumping maxVersion, which you've been doing it seems, > so far so good, all systems green :) > > The question is: who will update cs-lite if more changes are needed? > > Once this matter is clarified, once I know who's in charge, > I'll certainly be very happy to see cookiesafe-lite in Debian. > if this problems happens we'll deal with it then. the worse that will happen is we drop it from debian. it's not as if this package affects anything else. >> we can decide whether to let it propagate to wheezy after it's been >> around in sid for a while. > > experimental might be better suited if you don't want it to migrate to > testing automatically. If it were uploaded to unstable, you'd have to > create a placeholder RC bug just to prevent it from migrating, which > looks like an ugly piggy-back of the Debian suites and release process > to me. > > Bye, then maybe we should just let it auto-migrate into wheezy. all that matters is that the cs-lite version in wheezy works with the iceweasel version in wheezy. i don't understand your reluctance of having this package in debian. there is pretty much no maintenance cost - it's stable, unlikely to be buggy, and we can always drop it. if/when that becomes necessary, cookie-monster will probably have enough locales in that we can just tell people to switch to that. -- GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0 https://bitbucket.org/infinity0 https://launchpad.net/~infinity0
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature