On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 03:13:27PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > Re-adding the people who showed interest in helping as Cc:, please keep > them since I am not the only one working on Bacula. Yep, removed them all because I couldn't figured out who was still interested anymore... :) > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:11:48 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:56:41AM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > >> I am now part of this project, the next thing I will ask for is two > >> mailing lists: read-only -commits and -devel, the latter to be used as > >> Maintainers: in debian/control. And I will also ask for a Git > >> repository, which will be the succession of John's repository at > >> <http://git.debian.org/?p=users/jgoerzen/bacula>. > > Well, everything was done: > > <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-bacula-commits> > <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-bacula-devel> > <http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=summary> Okay, seen that. > > So what's the status of this? I need bacula and want to help (just > > requested to join), > > Just out of my curiosity, do you strictly need 5.0.3 (the current > upstream version) or could you work with 5.0.2 (the one currently in > Debian)? I am simply asking because if 5.0.3 is *necessary* for most of > the users, maybe we should ask for it as a stable-proposed-update, > instead of simply relying on backports.d.o. No, or to be more clear: I didn't check yet. I'm still running lenny systems with bacula. Considering #606262, I'm not going to upgrade before I tested that and possibly even worked on a lenny-update to fix that. > > I even -- since I started to look at bugs in the package first before > > looking here :-/ -- started to work on bacula, i.e. I have a clone of > > john's git repo here and have a few commits on it. I changed a bit, > > upgraded to 5.0.3 and am now trying to bring it a bit up2date > > packaging-wise. You're interested or do we have overlapping efforts > > now? > > For sure we are interested, the more people are looking at a package the > better it is, but there is an overlapping effort going on: José planned > to prepare an update version for this week-end, so I guess you should > contact him and check to not do any duplicate work anymore. > > I have not done anything yet, given that José promptly replied me (in > private), so I decided to let him doing the work and jump in later. I > have some complaints/improvements in my head, I will come back ;-) Okay, I'm in contact with him. Seems, I'm the only one who's commited anything yet. As soon as I have a git history that doesn't need rebasing anymore, I'll push it to alioth. Then I hope you're alright with my changes and we can go on from there... Hauke -- .''`. Jan Hauke Rahm <jhr@debian.org> www.jhr-online.de : :' : Debian Developer www.debian.org `. `'` Member of the Linux Foundation www.linux.com `- Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe www.fsfe.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature