[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#612296: bacula and bacula-doc



On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:56:41AM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> I am now part of this project, the next thing I will ask for is two
> mailing lists: read-only -commits and -devel, the latter to be used as
> Maintainers: in debian/control.  And I will also ask for a Git
> repository, which will be the succession of John's repository at
> <http://git.debian.org/?p=users/jgoerzen/bacula>.  Given that it must be
> editable by every one in the project, it should be created with `umaks
> 002`, as explained at:
> 
>   <http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Git#Separate_project>.
> 
> >>  Maybe I will ask on debian-devel@ and then decide about that.
> >> Anyway, if no one will complain in three days, I will ask for such a new
> >> Alioth project.
> >
> > Ok, let's use Alioth
> >  (though I'd prefer some repo hosted somewhere or whatever)

So what's the status of this? I need bacula and want to help (just
requested to join), I even -- since I started to look at bugs in the
package first before looking here :-/ -- started to work on bacula, i.e.
I have a clone of john's git repo here and have a few commits on it. I
changed a bit, upgraded to 5.0.3 and am now trying to bring it a bit
up2date packaging-wise. You're interested or do we have overlapping
efforts now?

Hauke

-- 
 .''`.   Jan Hauke Rahm <jhr@debian.org>               www.jhr-online.de
: :'  :  Debian Developer                                 www.debian.org
`. `'`   Member of the Linux Foundation                    www.linux.com
  `-     Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe      www.fsfe.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: