Bug#608852: Package should be removed..

Hi All,

Yes you are right, icecast2 is the only active package and it don't make sense have active the old release, in this case we support the idea that icecast must be dropped and make it as transitional package to icecast2.

Thank you, and have a good day,

Ivan, Gerardo

2011/2/1 Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>

On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:46:59AM -0600, Romain Beauxis wrote:

Well my main concern is about the confusion that can result of having two packages. I believe it would be important to know whether or not the old icecast provides something that icecast2 does not..

Confusion on what packages do is solved by clarifying package description, not by dropping packages. :-)

- Jonas

--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=6Lqp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----