[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#594368: Bug #594368



All right, so I've successfully updated the packaging for both gnote and dbus-c++, and I've uploaded them to mentors.debian.net as instructed by Ana. If any of you would like to look through my work and see if there's any issues, please feel free to do so.

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dbus-c++/
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnote/

Oh, and I'd say that Ana's plan sounds good. ;)

- Vincent

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Ana Guerrero <ana@debian.org> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:01:23PM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Just a follow-up...I've found the upstream source for dbus-c++ (turns out I
> missed its git archive), and I've successfully packaged it. Note that it's
> NOT lintian clean at the moment. I have no idea about manpages because I
> don't know what the binaries in dbus-c++-dev do, and the previous maintainer
> didn't bother including man pages either, so I'm stuck.
>

s/packaged/updated packaging/ :)
When you say you have packaged something it means you have done from scratch.

> https://github.com/Vincent-C/dbus-cplusplus
>
> Lintian output is in the README attached to that github repo. It's packaged
> with a QA upload in mind.
>
> Mr. Filoni, you would also have to adopt dbus-c++ and dbus-c++-dev if you
> still want to adopt Gnote. If you would still like to do so, please feel
> free to use my work; otherwise, I would just be as willing to adopt both
> gnote and these dbus packages. :)

Ok, so what about the following plan:

- QA uploads of tnome and dbus-c++ to update it to the latest version (as
some users asked)
- Then work with usptream and maintainer from other distros in getting
the next version of gnote using a different D-Bus implementation.

Ana


Reply to: