Bug#506040: Status of ceph ITP?
Hey Laszlo,
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 22:02 -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
> [ about OpenSSL license exception for ceph ]
> > I removed all the openssl references in the ceph code and replaced it
> > with crypto++, so hopefully all this discussion is now moot. It's all
> > pushed to the ceph rc branch.
> Does it mean that I shouldn't upload v0.23.2 [1] to Debian? Wait for
> the v0.24.0 release and upload that one? I know v0.23.2 is not even
> noted as a release on the homepage, but tagged in the git tree.
> Main changes are that debian/source/format is re-added, the tree cleaned
> as make distclean, backported cephfs.8 manpage as a patch, pristine
> clean the source, noted myself as maintainer while Sage remains as an
> uploader.
Yeah, let's just wait for 0.24. BTW, I made radosacl only build
--with-debug; it can be dropped from the package.
Thanks-
sage
>
> Laszlo/GCS
> Ps: Please delete parts of the email that not relevant to the
> conversation.
> [1] dget http://www.routers.hu/gcs/ceph_0.23.2-1.dsc
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
Reply to: