On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:47:02 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Has there been any development in wicd in the last months that > suggests that packaging new wicd stuff is worth it? Due to time costraints of upstream authors, development somewhat stalled in the last months. However, I've recently been accepted in the upstream team, I hope I can give some help there (starting from merging the patches shipped in the Debian package). And I know Adam Blackburn was preparing a bugfix release versioned 1.7.1 (I saw a "beta2" tarball of it, so I suppose it's coming out soonish). Iker, I see many people already reviewed your package. With my wicd-maintainer-hat on, I ask you to add a "Provides: wicd-client" to your binary package. Also, if it only depends on Qt libs, it would be better IMVHO if you (or upstream) named it "wicd-qt", to stay consistent with other clients (wicd-gtk and wicd-curses). Otherwise, wicd-kde would be fine -- but it's just a matter of consistency, you can call it whatever you like. Thank you, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature