[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#600942: marked as done (ITP: parallel -- Tool for executing jobs in parallel locally or using remote machines)



Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:23:45 -0500
with message-id <AANLkTikRAsciLoMOt2unbfmRRDvPmT_BxO3W5UwF6GDc@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line ITP bug duplicate
has caused the Debian Bug report #600942,
regarding ITP: parallel -- Tool for executing jobs in parallel locally or using remote machines
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
600942: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600942
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: darkjunix@gmail.com

* Package name    : parallel
  Version         : 20100922
  Upstream Author : Ole Tange
* URL             : http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
* License         : GPL3+
  Programming Lang: perl
  Description     : Tool for executing jobs in parallel locally or using remote machines

GNU parallel is a shell tool for executing jobs in parallel locally or using remote machines. A job is typically a single command or a small script that has to be run for each of the lines in the input. The typical input is a list of files, a list of hosts, a list of users, a list of URLs, or a list of tables.


Kind Regards,

--
Julián Moreno Patiño
Registered GNU Linux User ID 488513
PGP KEY ID 6168BF60

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- I close this bug, because is duplicate with #518696

Kind Regards,

--
Julián Moreno Patiño
Registered GNU Linux User ID 488513
PGP KEY ID 6168BF60

--- End Message ---

Reply to: