Bug#593285: additional info
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hey
Sorry for the late reply - I completely forgot this one.
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:49 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > That would still require someone to actually write said support ;)
> ;)
> "patches welcome"?! ^^
Exactly
> > [...]
> > It is certainly possible; a note though, I believe Fedora is
> > building the autotools plugin together with the CDT plugin[1],
> > so we may have to do this as well in Debian.
> What's the reason for them doing this? Seems rather ugly to me ;)
Not sure why they do it. It might be for legacy - last I checked they
built autotools and some "libhover" thingy together with -cdt.
Anyhow, I figured I would mention it in case someone decides to work on
this before I get to the bottom of my TODO list. If you/someone starts
on this and realises that we need to package autotools via -cdt, then
that is certainly possible (patches against -cdt to do this would
certainly also be welcome ^^).
On a related note, eclipse-cdt was uploaded to unstable a few days ago.
It was too late for Squeeze, but now there is something to base the
patches on, hehehe... ;)
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=HFzq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: