Bug#587553: ITP: bluej
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-10-12 18:03, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 08:27:41PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Any news on this ITP? On the 2nd of August you reported that it was
>> stalled until the next upstream release (due to license issues).
>> According to [1] upstream released a new version on August 25th, though
>> it does not list any license changes.
>
> Please accept my apologies, the ITP completely escaped my mind (I was
> packaging it for work and my work term ended before I got to it).
> License changes were included in the August 25th release. I'm still
> interested in packaging BlueJ and have it partially packaged. I'll try
> to complete it within the next two weeks (I'm swamped with exams and
> essays this week). On the off chance I don't have it done by say, the
> end of October, please feel free to take it over.
>
> Sorry for the wait and kind regards,
> Ryan
No worries; my todo list is long enough without BlueJ (and it probably
will be just as long far into November). I was just curious if you had
missed the new upstream release. :)
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=YGfC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: