[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#465821: I'll package this (preferrably in a team, so please join!)



Hi Jan,

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 10:55:58AM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 05:14:12PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I intend to use CDBS and Git at the collab-maint area of Alioth - do get in touch with me if interested in helping out!

I'm not a fan of CDBS and with the features of debhelper 7 I never saw a reason to use it again. As a consequence my experience with CDBS is almost NULL. If you changed your mind and packaged it without CDBS, I could see myself helping a bit (don't make this decision only depend on me, though).

Unfortunately I am quite decided about the use of CDBS: I use it consistently in all the 100+ packages that I am involved in maintaining, and am also active in the development of CDBS itself.

I'm not a fan of dh7 reinventing the wheel of the "make" language.

CDBS is a bunch of make patterns. So if you dislike the make language, I can see why you'd appreciate dh7.

I do hope that I get a chance to guide you through the benefits of CDBS and perhaps even convince you that is makes sense to use. :-)


  - Jonas

--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: