[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#568866: RFA: systemtap -- instrumentation system for Linux 2.6



retitle 568866 O: systemtap -- instrumentation system for Linux 2.6
thanks

Hello,

I'm orphaning this package now. If you want to maintain it, it's yours.
If you have questions about packaging I can help, but I don't have time
to co-maintain it.

Git repository is available in collab-main group on git.debian.org. I
packaged latest version only for experimental because I had no time to
make sure that -client and -server packages work correctly and have
correct dependencies. Everything else there should be ok.

8 лютого 2010 о 15:32 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum написав(-ла):
> I would be interested in co-maintaining systemtap. However, I'm not sure
> that we should continue to try to provide a systemtap package, given
> that it doesn't work out of the box because of #365349. (summary:
> systemtap requires kernel built with debug info, which can be split into
> a seperate package, but still requires quite a lot of archive space
> (~300MiB per arch), and space on the buildd while building (> 2GiB))
Yes, that's all true. Additionally building the kernel with debuginfo
requires a lot of time, at least on my system. IIRC some people
proposed/tried to implement debuginfo subsetting/compression in gcc, but
I'm not sure about present status. Anyway even without support for
official kernel systemtap can be useful for kernel development.

> 
> It's pretty sad, because Debian is currently the only major distro where
> systemtap doesn't work out of the box.
Yes, that is sad.

> -- 
> | Lucas Nussbaum
> | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
> | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
> 
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: