[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#561527: marked as done (ITP: netsniff-ng -- a high performance network sniffer for packet inspection)

Your message dated Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:23:31 +0100
with message-id <6f52f5b81002051023jab087d1xf6c4621a65caefb8@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line closing 561527, package already debianized
has caused the Debian Bug report #561527,
regarding ITP: netsniff-ng -- a high performance network sniffer for packet inspection
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
561527: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561527
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: netsniff-ng
Severity: wishlist

netsniff-ng is a high performance Linux network sniffer
for packet inspection. This tool is useful for debugging
your network, measuring performance throughput or creating
network statistics of incoming packets on central network
nodes like routers or firewalls. It works similar to
tcpdump, but a zero-copy mechanism for network packets
results in better performance than libpcap-based sniffers.

licence:
  GPL, version 2

url:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netsniff-ng/    or,
  http://code.google.com/p/netsniff-ng/

Best regards,
Daniel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: netsniff-ng
Version: >=0.5.3.1-1

netsniff-ng has already been debianized and uploaded, so the
bug report can be closed. The maintainer is Daniel Borkmann.

See: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=netsniff-ng

--- End Message ---
Reply to: