On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:06:28AM +0100, Henry-Nicolas Tourneur wrote:
> > | * License : No license, only a copyright file
> >
> > Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute?
> >
> Yeah but what Craig Small said on mentors is that looks very much like a MIT
> license - see COPYING file.
> His mail is here :
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/02/msg00027.html
But, that's still a license. But look carefully, it says "without fee" in the
license. I don't know if that means "you can use it without paying anyone" or
"you can only redistribute it if you don't charge anyone".
> So it's more some kind of errors from my side because that wasn't very
> clear.
> Should I update this bug to put MIT-like as license ?
It's better to include the whole license if it isn't exactly equal to a
standard license.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature