Bug#561302: O: esmtp -- User configurable relay-only MTA
Hi Salvatore,
For several years now that my maintenance of esmtp consists just in
accepting and applying patches with enhancements and bug fixes I
receive, with little or no alterations. Truth be said, it doesn't take
as much time as maintaining the debian packages, which you're taking
upon yourself. I could continue to maintain the upstream source a
little more in this fashion, but I have no plans of doing any coding
myself, so I don't think there's any point in pretending I'm
maintaining it. I rather make it clear the project is not being
maintained, so that users either take maintainership or start looking
for alternatives.
Jose
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
<salvatore.bonaccorso@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Unfortunately I still do not have an answer from Fedora's maintainer
> for esmtp for in case collaboration. In meantime I have updated esmtp
> package as QA upload, and requested updated translations for the
> debconf template [1]. First upload for esmtp 1.2-1 was sponsored by
> Gregor Herrmann (gregoa).
>
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2009/12/msg00074.html
>
> I'm still considering adopting esmtp. Jose, are you retiring
> completely from esmtp? Or will you still accept patches and do
> bugfixes?
>
> Bests
> Salvatore
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLP3XUAAoJEHidbwV/2GP+IisQAI3DuWVZJSxrE1pUJkiZ7Xl7
> utARKT0gPOqFHeQcwzCA3TMLHOwvcogNVdCR7DRbmfnxlVfkno71P1454JlTLmfh
> 5AGsOcdQKZ1S0oDhoZ3wBLtm5NHRS2xQTOSpx21MEkYEtON98fQAUGuHorFcrXRb
> O/pQZeoF9BDz5AC/F2fkazHZxVfhR9yXgccczuCmyTtTSbmXoKFzHY4Nc5FfD3MW
> ewTko1RxcO7NWNcDnLfBKvhMGec118eny2hG8NDQWuHCzBOcTyDdQf0Iiu0AEUsv
> VDHXccDBil65nlcla8p7TUOYPQDe4ocICXNN9B7R8RJhPJ2I60mvz2AaqHMjXlBW
> 56y+itE+g7H+TOOhV8nCF9M5PfOnxkY34uUYoe+QgpZzRIJIKi7oXUomdiDFT/Ec
> 2H9ZwqslSnGaFYQKPVJDUlGG1d1JsPmGVuhYib/Nkpa5jY8qp5XhtK1qDApoDZxN
> fhgqNaLpdXVMvGg4mz2bfW2WaFtmBLD7HukCaI9tkP/T+QHd3ZliYeWo3WFkOsix
> 9UwGoPa9Hryes+RW+D73EPRSEL+FJo3CuP442G+8v4HhyjBWv6eiF2wtDvVdVHIa
> rqCkysb/pByZ8c7uWf4upOPpePjwolpP30gBnijNhC6kWfWKY7ngNx2I3gBENVcI
> nUeXj3PhRUIwd4lUAg4x
> =XUrp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Reply to: