Bug#496586: Processed: owner

To: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>
Cc: 549357@bugs.debian.org, 496586@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#496586: Processed: owner
From: Leo 'costela' Antunes <costela@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:12:48 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 4B3B51D0.2070502@debian.org>
Reply-to: Leo 'costela' Antunes <costela@debian.org>, 496586@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <4B3B4F86.3070207@gmail.com>
References: <E1NPy0U-0002op-IB@phenomenon> <[🔎] handler.s.C.126217744120057.transcript@bugs.debian.org> <4B3B4F86.3070207@gmail.com>

[I'm re-adding the CCs to the bug logs, just to let people know what's
going on. Hope that's not a problem.]

Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Sorry Leo, I thought that bug owner was Tobias.
> Any problems for you, if I take the ITP ?

No problem, but how about co-maintaining?
Have you gotten rid of the segfault problem on amd64? I checked it a
couple of weeks back and there was absolutely no activity in upstream
SVN... I'm afraid whoever takes this might have to do some heavy C++
patching eventually...

Cheers

-- 
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#496586: Processed: owner
  - From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

References:
- Processed: owner
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Bug#496586: Processed: owner
Next by Date: Processed: merging 562509 562510
Previous by thread: Processed: owner
Next by thread: Bug#496586: Processed: owner
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread