Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

To: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
Cc: Pierre Chifflier <pollux@debian.org> (libcap-ng for {545558,545556}), Alejandro Garrido Mota <garridomota@gmail.com> (owner of 526867 for {526867}), <wnpp@debian.org> (wnpp for {526867})
Subject: Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:12:06 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.125256980917910.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20090910080318.B9F552D4095@elida.v7w.com>
References: <20090910080318.B9F552D4095@elida.v7w.com>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> # Thu Sep 10 08:03:12 UTC 2009
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: libwww-mechanize-gzip-perl
> tags 526867 + pending
Bug #526867 [wnpp] ITP: libwww-mechanize-gzip-perl -- Module to fetch webpages with  gzip-compression
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: libcap-ng
> tags 545556 + pending
Bug #545556 [libcap-ng] New upstream release
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: libcap-ng
> tags 545558 + pending
Bug #545558 [libcap-ng] Should libcap-ng have Priority optional?
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#543648: marked as done (ITP: prophet -- distributed database system)
Next by Date: Processed (with 1 errors): retitle
Previous by thread: Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Next by thread: Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread