Bug#535246: marked as done (ITA: roxterm -- multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator)
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:17:03 +0000
with message-id <E1MNskR-0004Jn-Cv@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#535246: fixed in roxterm 1.15.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #535246,
regarding ITA: roxterm -- multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
535246: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535246
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I offer this package for adoption. I do not have the time to maintain
this package.
--
Thierry Randrianiriana
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: roxterm
Source-Version: 1.15.2-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
roxterm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
roxterm_1.15.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.15.2-1.diff.gz
roxterm_1.15.2-1.dsc
to pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.15.2-1.dsc
roxterm_1.15.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.15.2-1_i386.deb
roxterm_1.15.2.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.15.2.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 535246@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk> (supplier of updated roxterm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:25:13 +0100
Source: roxterm
Binary: roxterm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.15.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk>
Changed-By: Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk>
Description:
roxterm - Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator
Closes: 485824 511114 535246
Changes:
roxterm (1.15.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (Closes: #535246).
* New upstream release (Closes: #511114, #485824).
* Use upstream manpages.
* debian/control:
+ Update Standards-Version to 3.8.2
* debian/rules:
+ Delete config.log in clean
* debian/copyright:
+ Refer to absolute licence file (GPL-3)
Checksums-Sha1:
528af97d63558eb47f4ba3e5688afcbf55e5b56d 1733 roxterm_1.15.2-1.dsc
40546b7d9016e76971d0cc2b17f3fa1f64c80da3 757247 roxterm_1.15.2.orig.tar.gz
ae420270cf5e12fee2aa2305e7de796e2295f029 4322 roxterm_1.15.2-1.diff.gz
6bbe2abfed0dc0fff5002dff7a9e4f2642cebff6 159878 roxterm_1.15.2-1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
c97bd01f49bad55c8b63e733a07a1dea275836ad5a1d184168c4785bbfb8a5d5 1733 roxterm_1.15.2-1.dsc
d2f90d569ab9532432abd2adcfc9ae1e908432caadfe17be56c759ef56972a80 757247 roxterm_1.15.2.orig.tar.gz
2da35fa2f78f6b143da9f7c588995691bf1313aa26552fee0d444ab7da6d3f4d 4322 roxterm_1.15.2-1.diff.gz
8f4cc08431def374f31c5416a0ee4d170eaf8963555d1634761f4988c80834e6 159878 roxterm_1.15.2-1_i386.deb
Files:
a765fd98480c3574511ed62f019e46d6 1733 x11 optional roxterm_1.15.2-1.dsc
c4988ce844b702a77f3609c623107e53 757247 x11 optional roxterm_1.15.2.orig.tar.gz
6ef33c8db65d82c1631f6f3742dc1b5b 4322 x11 optional roxterm_1.15.2-1.diff.gz
06c40b44f48c1322498b8953a43f060c 159878 x11 optional roxterm_1.15.2-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)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=wWun
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: