Clint Adams wrote: >I intend to orphan the mktemp package. > >The package description is: > This package provides a utility designed to make temporary > file handling in shell scripts simple and secure. > >It should be replaced entirely by the mktemp in coreutils. Why? Anyways, a wishlist bug in coreutils for them to provide it should be filed, I think (I would do it myself, but since I have no idea why this should happen...) Saludos, Felipe Sateler
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.