Twas brillig at 17:09:45 06.05.2009 UTC+05 when rrs@researchut.com did gyre and gimble: RRS> Given the pytagsfs upstream maintainer's announcement email [1], I RRS> believe python-inotify is not going to be maintained further. RRS> But this whole discussion started with python-inotify in RRS> experimental, which isn't backward compatible. RRS> I'm CCing the python-inotify maintainer. Probably he can give a RRS> better status of python-inotify. pyinotify is known for several (two? can't remember exactly) API breaks, yes. So, as there are applications which rely on another inotifyx (which is not an application, but a library), it has to be packaged. But pyinotify is not dead upstream. --
Attachment:
pgpLqqTQDrSDt.pgp
Description: PGP signature