tags 520955 + patch thanks Hi Johannes! Quickly reply, before the package reaches a too much wider audience. On Mon, 04 May 2009 15:58:08 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > I build a preliminary package for xf86-video-glamo. Thank you! > I named it 0.1.0 due to the fact that there are no tags yet in the > upstream git repository. This is wrong, sorry, because it will conflict if upstream will release a 0.1.0 version. I would prefer something similar to the linux-2.6-openmoko package and indeed the Debian Git repository has an upstream tag, 20090302.git451398a2: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-fso/xf86-video-glamo.git;a=tag;h=16b5d5811976df103796924809786a0a86a93e03 > I build the orig.tar.gz from git revision > b8b594393cb85c7c940f22456036d45e598d344e OK, based on the corresponding commit http://git.openmoko.org/?p=xf86-video-glamo.git;a=commit;h=b5eb5f79245bebe7857a4857dda996f82fecf5e5 the Debian package version should be 20090503.gitb5eb5f79-1. > and did `autoreconf -i` on the source. > > The package was mainly inspired by the xserver-xorg-video-fbdev > package. This is exactly what I tried from the Debian Git repository above and then I ended up with a compilation error. I did not investigated further because of lack of time, sorry. > I tried to compile a license file that is accurate enough to cover all > source code comments about copyright and licensing. > > Maybe you could fix things and add the missing bits there (Maintainer > and Uploaders fields are still empty) to have the package uploaded into > the pkg-fso repository? Sure, do you want to co-maintain the package? > I uploaded the source package and a binary for debian lenny armel here: > http://rabenfrost.net/openmoko/xserver-xorg-video-glamo/ I would remove them ASAP, simply because the version problem is a serious one IMHO. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Attachment:
pgpYJUCCDFGQM.pgp
Description: PGP signature