On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote: > But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports > both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1 > still be needed ? As I said in my other mail, for transition reasons; backward-compatibility is something many people like to *try* before actually taking the leap. Cheers, --Seb