[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#522996: ITP: jruby1.2 -- 100% pure-Java implementation of Ruby



On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
> important for jruby...

to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so you can at least, for
instance, try the new one on your existing jruby code without removing
the old one, for instance ?

Are you advocating for only one instance of jruby at all times in the
archive ? If so, why ?

Cheers,

--Seb



Reply to: