[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#247337: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: lives_0.9.8.10-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED]]



On Wed, December 17, 2008 22:50, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:01:59PM +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
>> On Tue, April 29, 2008 09:29, G�¼rkan Seng�¼n wrote:
>> >Dear Salsaman,
>> >
>> >Could you relicense all of your software parts of lives into
>> >GNU GPL v3, or 2, or 2.1, whatever you like best?
>> >
>> >That'll make inclusion of lives into Debian (and Ubuntu) a lot
>> >easier.
>> >
>> >Thank you,
>> >G�¼rkan
>>
>> Hi,
>> all of the LiVES software is licensed under the GPL v3 or later. The
>> only
>> exception is weed.h, weed.c, weed-utils.c which will become a library
>> under the LGPL v3 or later. If you find any source files which are
>> incorrectly licensed, please let me know and I will correct this.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I will take a look at the debian/copyright file and update it as
>> necessary.
>
> Hi,
>
> Any progress on this?  I'd really like to see an OGG-capable editor in
> Debian,
> and Lives looks like a good option.
>
> If you need more details, this was the response from FTP team (as posted
> in
> the bug log):
>
> <quote>
> Additionally your debian/copyright file is incomplete and misses
> (C)holders/license data. You have to include all such differences.
> Like all of libOSC/*, some of the icons.
>
> And next, it includes a mixture of GPL/LGPL v2/v2.1 and v3.
> Now you need to check if all v2/v2.1 ones are "or any later". If not it
> is undistributable.
> </quote>
>
>> RFX.spec is a documentation file which documents a standard. I am happy
>> to
>> change the license for this to whatever you recommend (what does debian
>> recommend for standards ?).
>
> GPL or LGPL would be fine.
>
> --
> Robert Millan
>
>   The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when
> (and
>   how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
>   still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
>













OK, all of the fixes asked for have now been checked in to CVS.

Can I now, *finally*, expect a debian package of LiVES !?!?!?!



Regards,
Gabriel "salsaman",
http://lives.sourceforge.net





Reply to: