Bug#507233: ITP: appliancekit -- tools for managing, creating and deploying software appliances
Hi,
The website isn't up yet. But, you can grab the source with Mercurial,
using " hg clone http://appliancekit.systeminplace.net/ ". Please report
any bugs or feature suggestions to http://devel.systeminplace.net/ .
Thanks for your interest!
(The upload in Debian will likely not happen for about a month or so,
there's still a lot that needs to be done.)
William
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 09:39 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:46:30PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org>
> >
> > * Package name : appliancekit
> > Version : 0.131
> > Upstream Author : William Pitcock <nenolod@systeminplace.net>
> > * URL : http://appliancekit.systeminplace.net/
>
>
> "To change this page, upload your website into the public_html
> directory"
>
> Looks like the website is not here.
>
> Can you provide a link to the sources ? I would like to test
> appliancekit.
>
> Cheers,
> Pierre
>
> > * License : ISC
> > Programming Lang: Python
> > Description : tools for managing, creating and deploying software appliances
> > ApplianceKit is a tool for authoring and distributing software appliances.
> > Appliance authors typically distribute the appliance in the form of an XML
> > metadata file, which ApplianceKit uses to compile into a functional
> > appliance.
> > .
> > ApplianceKit supports deploying to chroots, Xen domains, and VServer
> > containers. It is an essential tool for deploying virtual machines in a
> > hosting environment due to it's abilities to provide for a fully customized
> > environment inside the appliance instance.
> >
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: lenny/sid
> > APT prefers testing
> > APT policy: (500, 'testing')
> > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
Reply to: