Bug#296643: marked as done (RFP: libxsd-java -- the Sun XML Datatypes Library)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Nov 2008 11:59:43 -0600
with message-id <E1KwKlD-0006OU-WB@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #296643,
regarding RFP: libxsd-java -- the Sun XML Datatypes Library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
296643: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=296643
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : libxsdlib-java
Version : 20050210
Upstream Author : Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kohsuke.kawaguchi@eng.sun.com>
* URL : https://msv.dev.java.net/
* License : MIT and Apache 1.1
Description : Sun XML Datatypes Library
Sun XML Datatypes Library, Sun's Java[tm] technology implementation of
W3C's XML Schema Part 2 (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/), is
intended for use with applications that incorporate XML Schema Part 2.
.
This preview version implements the recommendation version
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/) of the W3C XML
Schema Part 2 Datatype.
.
This product includes software developed by the Apache Software
Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
Hi,
I need the library for continuing to package freemind.
Concerning the License, I was not sure, so asked upstream and got the
following answer (with my question quoted):
--- 8< ---
> Hence my question to you: the license to be applied to xsdlib is not
> clear to me. In the package, there is some Sun and some Apache license
> files. Can you please explain to me under which license xsdlib can/has
> to be distributed?
It's a mixture of the apache license and the MIT license. The most of
the code is under the MIT license (see license.txt in the bundle), and a
small portion of it is under the apache license (see
Apache-LICENSE-1.1.txt)
I hope this won't make your life too hard. There are too many licenses
in the world!
--- 8< ---
So true ;-)
Thanks in advance,
Eric
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this is an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 296643
stop
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
296643@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: