Bug#493109: ITP: json-static -- JSON validator and converter for OCaml

[Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>]

Shouldn't the package name include "ocaml" somewhere?  Doesn't ocaml
have some sort of standard package/library package-naming convention?

Something like this is pretty clearly language specific (many languages
have json i/o libraries).  Including "ocaml" in the package name would
both be much more convenient for the user (when searching for something
like a json support library, often one must wade through a lot of
inapplicable packages), and safer against future name collision to
include ocaml.

Thanks,

-Miles

-- 
Twice, adv. Once too often.